Monthly Archives: April 2016

Cash Screen

Net Debt < (30%) of Market Cap
Notable Results:

  • Visteon Corporation
  • NetApp

Preference is to find companies with > $1,000 net cash, as any acquisition rumors are likely to garner significant attention to stir the markets.

Screening Review

  • Visteon Corporation (VC)
    • Now a pure play “cockpit” player following divestiture / sale of Halla Visteon
    • Strong capital allocation
    • Management has been buying a significant number of shares
    • $2.9bn market cap and $744m Enterprise value (2.8bn cash & 384 debt)
  • United Therapeutics (UTHR)
    • $4,995m market cap
    • $953m in cash, $5.4mm debt
    • Risks
      • Competition from Actelion
      • Remodulin (largest product) has generic competitor in Summer 2018
      • Limited product pipeline

Housing Prices in San Francisco

The cost of living in San Francisco is similar to that of New York, as evidenced by the median sale price of homes and rent per month.

However, a wide disparity exists: the price per square foot per home in San Francisco is still much lower than that of New York. This enables us to deduce that 1) homes in SF are probably much larger than those in New York and 2) there is still significant room for Real Estate in San Francisco to appreciate to what (arguably) represents its terminal value – Price per Square Foot in New York.

Upside Considerations:

  • There is more land available in San Francisco
  • San Francisco infrastructure still has a lot of room for improvement (Transbay Terminal; BART extension to China Town)
  • San Francisco is a first mover with respect to *potential* new infrastructure technologies (driverless cars, micro-housing projects)
  • Desirable climate
  • Growing technology industry

Downside Considerations

  • Growth of housing supply in Oakland
  • Updating policies associated with housing supply restrictions in SF

Despite high pries, perhaps property values still represent a significant discount to terminal value?

Source Data: Zillow

S&P downgrades Nordstrom rating by one notch to BBB-plus

Standard & Poor’s on Friday downgraded Nordstrom Inc.’s rating by one notch to BBB-plus from A-minus, citing weaker credit metrics and the expectation that the retailer will keep leverage above 2.0 times for some time.

  • “Weaker performance became apparent in the third quarter of fiscal 2015, a result of unseasonably warm weather denting sales of winter apparel and a protracted promotional environment that continued into the fourth quarter, which contributed to continued weak holiday sales with 1% consolidated same-store sales,”

Kohl’s (KSS) Equity Assessment

Kohl’s has had a difficult time sustaining it’s top-line growth, due to their failed initiative of  pushing private-label inventory (to increase profitability) which resulted in diminished growth.

As a result, Kohl’s is shifting it’s inventory mix to include more national labels. This act comes at the expense of profitability.

While Kohl’s generates healthy cash flow (and prudently allocates a large proportion of it to shareholders), total payout as a % of LFCF has been increasing significantly.

The consumer discretionary sector has been pumelled recently, due to poor results from department stores Macy’s and JC Penny. In lock-step w/ the rest of the sector, KSS has seen significant multiple compression. It is currently trading at 10.9x P / NTM earnings w/ a 1 year average of 12.2x and max of 17.4x. Upon further evaluation of its historic valuation, the 17.4x max seems unjustifiable (or more indicative of animal spirits associated with lower oil prices). It’s 3 year average and median equal 12.6x and 12.3x, respectively.

At 5% EPS growth and gravitating towards its 1-year historical valuation, KSS represents a potential 16.4% return (to $52.51 / share), representing an illustrative upside case to current (the street expects ~ 3-4% EPS growth for the next few years).

Back of the envelope math:

I’d like to see the following with respect to KSS becoming an enticing equity play:

  • Higher traffic in store
  • High capture rate of customers in regions where Macy’s, JC Penny, and Sears/K-Mart stores are closing down
  • Increased gross profit dollars (lower margin + higher revenue) from “Greatness Initiative”
  • Experimentation w/ smaller format stores
  • CapEx experimentation w/ new tech (variable pricing) (although I understand this is not generally in Kohl’s culture)

Twitter NFL Streaming Package

Twitter Inc. just did its first broadcast deal, and it’s a big one. The company will stream 10 Thursday night National Football League games during the 2016 season, a package that cost the service around $10 million, according to a person familiar with the matter.

via Bloomberg

At around $1 million per game, Twitter is paying a small fraction of what would seem to be the market rate

  • Yahoo paid $17 million to stream a single game from London, which was played at 9:30 a.m. New York time and also broadcast on network TV in the teams’ home markets
  • In the most recent broadcast deal, CBS Corp. and Comcast Corp.’s NBC each paid about $45 million a game for five Thursday night contests each during the 2016 and 2017 seasons

“The platform is built around live events already. We want to see how they use the unique platform, and syndicated tweets all over the Internet is going to be interesting.” – NFL